Symbol map and intertwining

The symbol map \(\sigma_k\) extracts from a tangent cube E0016 a symmetric probe E0027 that carries the same differential information. It intertwines the cubical and symmetric pushforwards.

(1) Definition (Symbol map).

\[ \sigma_k: CT_k(X; x) \to ST_k(X; x), \qquad \sigma_k(c) := \sum_{\pi \in \Part(k)} \prod_{A \in \pi} c(A), \]

where the products are in the symmetric algebra. On affine cubes, \(\sigma_k(\Aff(v_1, \dots, v_k)) = v_1 \cdots v_k\).

(2) Lemma (Spanning). For every \(1 \leq r \leq k\) and \(v_1, \dots, v_r \in E\), the monomial \(v_1 \cdots v_r\) lies in the image of \(\sigma_k\). The image of \(\sigma_k\) together with \(1\) spans \(ST_k(X; x)\).

Proof. Choose a partition \([k] = B_1 \sqcup \cdots \sqcup B_r\) and set \(c(B_j) := v_j\), \(c(A) := 0\) for all other \(A\). Only \(\pi = \set{B_1, \dots, B_r}\) contributes to \(\sigma_k(c)\), giving \(v_1 \cdots v_r\).

(3) Proposition (Symbol factorization). For \(f \in C^k(X, G)\) and \(c \in CT_k(X; x)\),

\[ D^\square(f; x; c) = D(f; x; \sigma_k(c)). \]

Proof. The collapse partition formula E0031 \(D^\square(f; x; c) = \sum_\pi D(f; x; (c(A))_{A \in \pi})\) is exactly the differential pairing evaluated at \(\sigma_k(c)\).

(4) Theorem (Intertwining). For \(\phi\) \(C^k\) near \(x\),

\[ \sigma_k \circ D^\square_+(\phi; x) = D_+(\phi; x) \circ \sigma_k. \]

Proof. Expand \(\sigma_k(D^\square_+(\phi; x) c)\): the partition formula E0031 on each face gives \(\sum_{\pi \in \Part(k)} \prod_{A \in \pi} \sum_{\rho_A \in \Part(A)} D(\phi; x; (c(B))_{B \in \rho_A})\). Expanding the product, the index data \((\pi, (\rho_A))\) correspond bijectively to pairs \((\rho, \KQ)\) of a partition \(\rho \in \Part(k)\) and a partition \(\KQ\) of the block set of \(\rho\): set \(\rho = \bigsqcup_A \rho_A\) and \(\KQ = \set{\rho_A : A \in \pi}\).

On the other side, \(D_+(\phi; x; \sigma_k(c)) = \sum_{\rho \in \Part(k)} \sum_{\KQ \in \Part(\rho)} \prod_{Q \in \KQ} D(\phi; x; (c(B))_{B \in Q})\). The two sums agree term by term.

(5) Proposition (Contravariant collapse). For \(f\) \(C^k\) near \(x\) and \(c \in CT_k(X; x)\),

\[ \lim_{t \to 0} t^{-k} \langle \Delta(f; x), \lambda_t c \rangle = D(f; x; \sigma_k(c)). \]

Proof. Apply collapse E0031 and symbol factorization.


Used by: